Resistance surveillance results

The spread of rats against which some rodenticides no longer work has taken a “surprising and troubling” turn, according to Dr Alan Buckle, chairman of the Campaign for Responsible Rodenticide Use (CRRU).

The organisation’s 2019-2020 survey results showed not only that 74% of rats analysed carried a resistance gene but, of those studied, one-in-five had two different genes in widespread locations: County Durham, West and East Yorkshire, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Dorset and on the West-East Sussex border.

Dr Buckle said: “Although one such rat was found in 2017, this is the first time in the UK that ‘hybrid-resistance’ has been found on this scale, with potentially unknown difficulties for pest rodent control. This is happening because different resistance foci, that were once separate, are now merging and interbreeding. A critical upshot is that pest controllers, farmers and gamekeepers should avoid using rodenticides that don’t work where resistance exists or using resistance-busters where they’re not necessary: both are bad for wildlife residues”.

Other recent CRRU research found 58% of professional pest controllers say they are “not very” or “not at all” concerned about resistance. Dr Buckle added: “We want them all to be concerned and know what to do about it”. Equally serious, this research also identified that one-third of farmers couldn’t recall brand names of rodenticides they use, and only 28% claimed to know the active ingredient.

Everyone connected with rodenticide use needs to wake up to this issue, pay attention to the information available and change the way they use anticoagulant rodenticides accordingly.